Having in mind that the United States have no countenance to monarchy as a form of government, in general, and that the European Union (constituted, among other countries, by 7 monarchies) also has no serious interest in Serbia becoming a stable state, I still think that KINGDOM IS A BETTER FORM OF GOVERNMENT THAN REPUBLIC FOR SERBIA IN THE 21. CENTURY.
Despite the fact that the communists, and their children, and their grandchildren, and their mutated successors, have to a great extent managed, through frenzied propaganda, to alienate the idea of monarchy from the citizens of Serbia, and that the very mentioning of a king or monarchy drives a certain proportion of the citizens into amok, I still think that KINGDOM IS A BETTER FORM OF GOVERNMENT THAN REPUBLIC FOR SERBIA IN THE 21. CENTURY.
Being aware that HRH Crown Prince Alexander speaks bad Serbian, that he does not get on well with other members of the Royal House, that his sons live abroad, and that the agents of mutated communist secret services are in his closest surrounding, I still think that KINGDOM IS A BETTER FORM OF GOVERNMENT THAN REPUBLIC FOR SERBIA IN THE 21. CENTURY
BECAUSE the King, who is not elected, and who does not owe his position to any political party, will express the state unity of Serbia better than any president of republic, who is elected, either directly, or in parliament, by a „majority“ of 51%, which, in fact, represents a significantly lesser part of the electorate.
BECAUSE the King, descendant of Serbian Kings and relative of European Kings, will represent Serbia in the country and abroad better than any president of republic.
BECAUSE the King, who is independent of any political party and impartial to all of them, will be more objective in upholding and defending the constitution than any president of
BECAUSE the King, grandson of the King who had led
No comments:
Post a Comment